NEW YORK — Wimbledon mixed doubles champion Sem Verbeek has expressed deep disappointment over the US Open’s decision to alter the format of mixed doubles, describing the move as heartbreaking for players and fans alike. The Dutch player, who triumphed at Wimbledon alongside partner Demi Schuurs, said his "heart is bleeding" over the changes, which he believes undermine the spirit of the competition.
The US Open announced earlier this month that it would reduce the number of mixed doubles matches in the main draw and eliminate the traditional best-of-three-sets format in favor of a shortened 10-point tiebreaker for the third set. The decision has drawn criticism from players, particularly those who specialize in doubles, who argue that the changes diminish the prestige and competitive integrity of the event.
A Blow to Doubles Specialists
Verbeek, a seasoned doubles player, emphasized that mixed doubles is not just a sideshow but a vital part of tennis. "This isn’t just about entertainment—it’s about the legacy of the sport," he said. "Mixed doubles has a rich history, and these changes feel like a step backward."
The US Open’s decision follows a trend of tournaments experimenting with shorter formats to attract viewers. However, Verbeek and other players argue that the changes disproportionately affect doubles specialists, who already struggle for recognition compared to their singles counterparts. Key concerns include:
- Reduced playing opportunities for doubles-focused athletes
- Loss of traditional scoring, which tests endurance and strategy
- Diminished prestige for a discipline with deep roots in tennis history
Player Backlash and Tournament Justification
The US Open has defended the changes, citing scheduling challenges and the need to streamline the event. Tournament director Stacey Allaster stated, "We are constantly evaluating ways to enhance the fan experience and ensure the smooth operation of the tournament." However, players like Verbeek remain unconvinced.
Verbeek’s sentiments were echoed by fellow doubles specialist Neal Skupski, who called the decision "disrespectful to the doubles community." Skupski, a two-time Grand Slam doubles champion, added, "We train just as hard as singles players, and we deserve equal respect."
Historical Context
Mixed doubles has long been a staple of Grand Slam tournaments, dating back to the early 20th century. Legends like Martina Navratilova, John McEnroe, and Billie Jean King have all celebrated victories in the discipline. Verbeek pointed out that "shortening the format erases part of that legacy—it’s not just about the points, it’s about the stories we create on court."
What’s Next for Mixed Doubles?
With the US Open standing firm on its decision, players are left to adapt or protest. Verbeek hinted at potential collective action, saying, "If enough of us speak up, maybe they’ll listen. This isn’t just about one tournament—it’s about the future of our sport."
The ATP and WTA have yet to comment on the controversy, but insiders suggest that player councils may push for discussions with tournament organizers. For now, the debate highlights the tension between modernization and tradition in tennis.
Conclusion: A Call for Balance
As the US Open approaches, the mixed doubles controversy serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between innovation and respect for tennis’s heritage. Verbeek’s emotional response underscores the passion players have for the game—and their desire to protect its traditions. "My heart is bleeding," he repeated, "but I won’t stop fighting for what’s right."