PARIS — World No. 1 Iga Swiatek sparked controversy during her French Open semi-final clash against Aryna Sabalenka, suggesting the umpire showed favoritism toward her opponent in a tense moment that could have shifted the match’s momentum.
Swiatek, the defending champion, lost 6-7(5), 6-4, 6-4 in a grueling three-set battle that lasted over two and a half hours. However, the match’s turning point came in the second set when Swiatek questioned why the umpire, Marijana Veljovic, did not check a mark after Sabalenka’s shot was called in. The Polish star’s frustration was evident as she gestured toward the umpire and muttered a bitter remark caught by on-court microphones: "Of course, no call against Aryna. Unbelievable."
The Controversial Moment
The incident occurred at 4-4 in the second set, with Sabalenka serving. A deep forehand from the Belarusian was called in, but Swiatek immediately stopped play, insisting the ball was out. Veljovic, however, declined to inspect the mark, ruling that Swiatek had not stopped the point quickly enough. The decision left Swiatek visibly agitated, and she later vented her frustration in her post-match press conference.
"I mean, it’s not the first time," Swiatek said, "I feel like sometimes these decisions go in one direction, and it’s not mine. It’s a bit frustrating, especially in such an important match."
Sabalenka’s Response
Sabalenka, who went on to win the match and reach her first French Open final, dismissed the suggestion of preferential treatment. "I didn’t even notice it," she said. "I was just playing my game. If the umpire didn’t check it, it’s because she didn’t think it was necessary."
Tennis analysts were divided on the issue. Some argued that Swiatek had a legitimate grievance, while others pointed out that umpires often rely on players to make immediate challenges. Former player and commentator Pam Shriver noted, "It’s a tough call, but in high-pressure moments, umpires tend to stick with their initial judgment unless there’s a clear reason to overrule."
History of Tension
This isn’t the first time Swiatek has hinted at perceived bias in big matches. Earlier this year, she expressed frustration over scheduling decisions that she felt favored other top players. The rivalry between Swiatek and Sabalenka has grown increasingly intense, with their last five meetings all going to three sets.
Key moments that fueled Swiatek’s frustration:
- The umpire’s refusal to check the mark despite Swiatek’s insistence.
- A late overrule in Sabalenka’s favor during a crucial first-set tiebreak.
- Multiple line calls that Swiatek believed were incorrect but went unchallenged.
Fan and Expert Reactions
Social media erupted with debate, with Swiatek’s supporters accusing the umpire of inconsistency, while Sabalenka’s fans argued that Swiatek was looking for excuses. Tennis journalist Ben Rothenberg tweeted, "Swiatek has a point—umpires should be more consistent in checking marks, especially in high-stakes matches. But Sabalenka played the bigger points better, and that’s what decided it."
Conclusion
While the controversy added drama to an already thrilling match, Sabalenka’s victory was ultimately decided by her aggressive play in key moments. Swiatek, despite her frustrations, acknowledged Sabalenka’s performance, saying, "She was just better today. I’ll learn from this and come back stronger."
The incident, however, raises questions about umpiring consistency in Grand Slam matches. With the rivalry between Swiatek and Sabalenka heating up, future clashes between the two will undoubtedly be under even greater scrutiny.
As the tennis world shifts focus to the final, one thing is clear: the tension between these two champions is far from over, and every decision—no matter how small—could be the difference between victory and defeat.